We fact-checked three of her critics’ assaults. One was false, one was lacking important context and one was deceptive.
We additionally fact-checked two of the claims Ocasio-Cortez herself has made in regards to the Capitol revolt. One was unproven and one was false.
Details First: Owens’ false claims have been debunked in 2019, once they have been made by others. Ocasio-Cortez did not stage a phony photograph shoot. She was photographed, by photojournalists, as she participated in a 2018 protest on a street exterior a tent metropolis shelter in Texas that was used to detain migrant youngsters, together with some the Trump administration had separated from their dad and mom. Whereas the protesters — lots of whom wore all white — weren’t permitted to stroll proper as much as the tents on the Tornillo facility, it’s inaccurate to say they have been “at a car parking zone.”
Ocasio-Cortez made the journey to Texas days earlier than she turned a nationwide title by defeating a high-ranking incumbent congressman in a Democratic major in New York. The pictures of Ocasio-Cortez trying emotional throughout the protest didn’t go viral till a yr later, when Texas photojournalist Ivan Pierre Aguirre tweeted
a few of his pictures from his work that day.
“For (Owens) to say it was a staged photograph shoot makes me upset as a result of that questions me as an expert photojournalist. To today I’ve by no means spoken to AOC. I did not speak to her that day or earlier than the pictures. I simply noticed a second and began to make pictures as I’m wired to do,” Aguirre stated in an e-mail to CNN on Thursday.
Aguirre additionally emphasised that they weren’t standing beside a “car parking zone.” One other photojournalist stated the identical to PolitiFact in 2019.
Owens shouldn’t be the one conservative media determine to mock or problem Ocasio-Cortez’s account of being scared for her life throughout the revolt. A number of the critics have pointedly famous that Ocasio-Cortez was in her workplace within the Cannon Home Workplace Constructing on the time, not within the Capitol itself.
Details First: These claims from Ocasio-Cortez critics omit key context. First, the Cannon constructing is linked to the Capitol through an underground walkway that’s often utilized by legislators, aides, journalists and others; the Cannon constructing is taken into account a part of the Capitol advanced. Second, Ocasio-Cortez didn’t mislead about the place she was throughout the revolt; she explicitly defined on Instagram Dwell that her workplace is in a constructing close to the Capitol.
Third, the Capitol Police instructed
individuals to evacuate the Cannon constructing amid the Capitol assault. (The all-clear was introduced lower than an hour after the evacuation announcement.)
Fourth, a pipe bomb was discovered that day exterior the workplace of the Republican Nationwide Committee, which is simply down the road from the Cannon constructing. Google Maps places the strolling distance between the 2 buildings at 260 toes.
“Because the Capitol advanced was stormed and other people have been being killed, none of us knew within the second what areas have been compromised,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted
on Thursday in response to criticism from Republican Rep. Nancy Mace.
What Ocasio-Cortez stated
Mace, a South Carolina congresswoman, appeared to problem Ocasio-Cortez’s claims about what occurred on the Cannon constructing. “I am two doorways down from @aoc and no insurrectionists stormed our hallway…” Mace tweeted
to Mace famous that Mace informed a newspaper in January that she had barricaded herself in her workplace throughout the assault.
Mace then responded
: “*FACT CHECK* I’ve not as soon as discounted your concern. We have been ALL terrified that day. I am stating the truth that insurrectionists have been by no means in our hallway… as a result of they weren’t. I deal in info. Not like you, apparently.”
Details First: Mace’s “FACT CHECK” is deceptive. Ocasio-Cortez by no means stated that insurrectionists have been of their hallway. Reasonably, in Ocasio-Cortez’s telling of the story on Instagram, she stated she had been scared that day by a person in her workplace she had thought was a rioter however turned out to be a Capitol Police officer. She stated the officer had not initially recognized himself as a member of legislation enforcement, had been shouting, “The place is she?” and had checked out her “with an amazing quantity of anger and hostility.”
Mace might need been confused as a result of some journalists’ preliminary tweets about Ocasio-Cortez’s Instagram story didn’t accurately convey what Ocasio-Cortez had stated in regards to the police officer she had thought was a rioter. However there isn’t a foundation to counsel Ocasio-Cortez claimed an precise rioter had been close to her within the Cannon constructing. (Ocasio-Cortez’s accusations in regards to the officer’s conduct haven’t been verified.)
Whereas rejecting the accusation that she exaggerated the menace to her security, Ocasio-Cortez tweeted
on Wednesday, “The bombs Trump supporters planted surrounded our workplaces too.”
: The assertion that Trump supporters planted the bombs has not been proved. We do not but know the identification or motivation of the particular person the FBI believes positioned pipe bombs exterior the workplaces of the Republican Nationwide Committee and Democratic Nationwide Committee the evening earlier than the revolt. The FBI remains to be searching for info on a suspect whose look was obscured by a face masks and hooded sweatshirt.
Trump supporters have been chargeable for the Capitol revolt, so Ocasio-Cortez has an apparent foundation for assuming that Trump supporters have been additionally chargeable for the bombs. However it’s certainly an assumption at this level. (Ocasio-Cortez’s employees didn’t reply to our request for remark for this text.)
Ted Cruz’s position
Sen. Ted Cruz tweeted
final week that he agreed with an Ocasio-Cortez tweet criticizing the Robinhood inventory buying and selling app firm and floating the thought of a congressional committee listening to. Ocasio-Cortez responded
, “I’m completely happy to work with Republicans on this subject the place there’s frequent floor, however you nearly had me murdered 3 weeks in the past so you’ll be able to sit this one out. Joyful to work w/ nearly another GOP that are not attempting to get me killed. Within the meantime if you wish to assist, you’ll be able to resign.”
Details First: There is no such thing as a proof for the accusation that Cruz was “attempting” to get Ocasio-Cortez killed. Whereas Ocasio-Cortez can mount an affordable argument that the Texas Republican’s actions had the impact of fueling the violent revolt, that is completely different than saying he truly tried to attain the killing of any member of Congress. Cruz didn’t advocate violence in opposition to Ocasio-Cortez, a lot much less name for her homicide.
There’s a distinction between Ocasio-Cortez’s two accusations within the tweet.
Her declare that Cruz “nearly had me murdered” can maybe be defended as a subjective argument in regards to the affect of Cruz’s conduct, impartial of his intentions. Ocasio-Cortez was not exaggerating when she recommended the violent mob posed a menace to her life; at the least one member of the mob allegedly known as for her to be assassinated. And it is truthful sufficient to argue, as Ocasio-Cortez spokeswoman Lauren Hitt did in an e-mail to CNN on Thursday, that Cruz’s phrases “undoubtedly inspired” the mob. Cruz, citing “unprecedented allegations of voter fraud,” was a pacesetter of the trouble to problem the certification of Joe Biden’s totally official victory.
But it surely’s nonetheless baseless to say that Cruz was “attempting” to get Ocasio-Cortez killed. There may be simply no proof that he tried to trigger bodily hurt to her.
“Sen. Cruz calling for a debate on the earth’s best deliberative physique shouldn’t be tried homicide,” Cruz spokeswoman Maria Jeffrey Reynolds informed CNN in a Thursday e-mail.
Hitt stated Ocasio-Cortez stands by her tweet as an affordable remark. Hitt argued that since Cruz continued to make his incendiary false claims in regards to the election “even after it was clear the mob had violent intentions” and didn’t attempt to step in to forestall the violence, he “bears direct accountability for the murders and tried murders carried out that day. To absolve him of intentionality is to counsel that he had no data that this mob might be violent, which greater than strains credulity.”
We are saying there is a substantial distinction between claiming that Cruz bears accountability for the violence (once more, subjective) and claiming he truly sought Ocasio-Cortez’s dying (once more, groundless).