In our collection of letters from African journalists, Sudanese author Zeinab Mohammed Salih appears to be like on the conflict over what kids needs to be taught at school within the post-revolution period.
The euphoria following the ousting of Sudan’s long-serving President Omar al-Bashir has been changed by the exhausting work of cementing the democratic revolution.
However a conflict over the brand new faculty curriculum with some non secular figures has uncovered the difficult path that the transitional authorities is treading.
Final month, at Friday prayers in a mosque within the capital, Khartoum, an imam identified for his assist of Bashir passionately shouted “Allah, Allah, Allah” earlier than encouraging the male worshippers to scream and cry over the inclusion of the well-known Michelangelo portray The Creation of Adam in a post-revolution historical past textual content ebook.
Imam Mohamed al-Amin Ismail believed the portray, which kinds a part of the Sistine Chapel within the Vatican, was a heretical picture.
He additionally lashed out at Suna, the official information company, for giving a platform to Omer al-Qarray, one of many folks behind the brand new faculty programme, accusing him of selling infidelity and atheism.
Following the imam’s intervention, many different pro-Bashir imams joined him to launch a marketing campaign towards the brand new curriculum and Mr Qarray himself. His household later mentioned that they’d acquired dying threats over his work.
Then, Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok froze the introduction of the brand new curriculum.
Mr Qarray, who belongs to the Republican Brotherhood – a Muslim group that has a progressive interpretation of Islam – resigned from the curriculum mission in protest.
He felt that the prime minister had ignored him and different political events, and solely listened to extremists and pro-Bashir Islamist teams.
There was additionally a dispute over easy methods to current elements of Sudan’s nineteenth Century historical past.
How the revolution unfolded:
December 2018 : Protests towards bread worth rises after authorities eliminated subsidies
February 2019: Bashir declares state of emergency and sacks cupboard and regional governors in bid to finish weeks of protests towards his rule, by which as much as 40 folks died
April 2019: Navy topples Bashir in a coup, begins talks with opposition on transition to democracy
June 2019: Safety forces open fireplace on protesters, killing at the very least 87
September 2019: A brand new authorities takes workplace underneath Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok as a part of a three-year power-sharing settlement between the navy, civilian representatives and protest teams
‘The revolution is on the curriculum’
The row over what the subsequent era needs to be studying has uncovered tensions between folks from totally different political and social views on the coronary heart of the brand new political settlement.
Some former insurgent teams which as soon as had ties with Bashir’s regime welcomed the prime minister’s resolution to halt the brand new curriculum.
For instance, Sulieman Sandal, from the Justice and Equality Motion (Jem), whose kids live in Norway, backed Mr Hamdok and its chief Gibril Ibrahim, the not too long ago appointed finance minister whose kids live within the UK and all finding out secular curriculums, had been then accused of hypocrisy.
Sharia was first launched into Sudanese legislation in September 1983 in the course of the rule of President Jaafar Numair. It was one of many causes behind the lengthy civil battle with what was then the southern a part of the nation and is now South Sudan.
Islamic legislation was then suspended for 3 years in the course of the democratically elected authorities of Sadiq el-Mahdi however was revived when Bashir took energy in 1989 in a navy coup backed by an Islamist social gathering.
The transitional authorities that changed Bashir has already proven its reluctance to sort out the thorny problem of Sharia, which is on the coronary heart of the battle with rebels in South Kordofan.
Essentially the most outstanding insurgent group there, the SPLM-N, has demanded that the federal government take a secular method. Final yr it rejected a peace deal agreed by different events and accused the transitional authorities of colluding with Islamists.
The SPLM-N, which operates from an space inhabited by many Christians and different non-Muslims, has been preventing for individuals who are politically and economically marginalised.
Alcohol ban partly lifted
The brand new transitional authorities has made some strikes that make life simpler for them.
Solely six months in the past, it dropped legal guidelines that prohibited non-Muslims from ingesting alcohol, although it’s nonetheless banned for Muslims.
However in accordance with some reviews, the flogging of drunken folks and the arrest of alcohol brewers has not stopped in locations on the outskirts Khartoum.
You may additionally be desirous about:
The SPLM-N leaders imagine that the one method to assure the rights of all and particularly non-Muslims in Sudan is by having a secular authorities which is able to then create an financial programme that may make sure the honest distribution of the wealth and energy within the nation.
It’s the solely manner that “non-Muslims is not going to be damage”, says Abbakr Ismail, a novelist and insurgent chief.
The transitional authorities is made up of a coalition of teams – together with generals who had been as soon as near Bashir and a few events with an Islamist ideology.
With the present transfer on the curriculum, the federal government seems to be extra involved with being in concord with extra conservative views quite than turning into a consultant authorities that displays the range of the nation racially, religiously and culturally, which might assist cease the battle.
Extra Letters from Africa:
Comply with us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Fb at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica